E
eurocar504
New member
- Joined
- 03.04.2024
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 8
I recently read about the ECO start feature. I was always under the impression that the feature was overall a bad idea, especially because of the wear on the starter.
But I have come to change my mind.
There are lots of consequences caused by the repeated cranking to take into consideration, but the main argument against that feature is usually the starter.
It relies on an upgraded starter, which might end up lasting as long as the old type in spite of the added use. Of course, this in itself is not worth it.
In addition, though, the starting procedure is much different than usual. When the engine stops, the crankshaft sensor and camshaft sensors determine with precision the position of the cylinders. When the engine restarts, the cylinder best positioned to turn the engine is fired up at the same time as the starter actuation, which lessen the load on the starter and the cranking time. The cranking time is 20ms or less!
There are other improvements that were made to elliviate other issues, such as main bearing wear, transmission oil pressure loss and battery life.
In my opinion, the way that feature works makes the added wear to the different parts involved quite negligeable in contrast to the added fuel economy, the reduction of pollution, and the reduction of wear on parts that are being used less (when the engine is stopped).
But I have come to change my mind.
There are lots of consequences caused by the repeated cranking to take into consideration, but the main argument against that feature is usually the starter.
It relies on an upgraded starter, which might end up lasting as long as the old type in spite of the added use. Of course, this in itself is not worth it.
In addition, though, the starting procedure is much different than usual. When the engine stops, the crankshaft sensor and camshaft sensors determine with precision the position of the cylinders. When the engine restarts, the cylinder best positioned to turn the engine is fired up at the same time as the starter actuation, which lessen the load on the starter and the cranking time. The cranking time is 20ms or less!
There are other improvements that were made to elliviate other issues, such as main bearing wear, transmission oil pressure loss and battery life.
In my opinion, the way that feature works makes the added wear to the different parts involved quite negligeable in contrast to the added fuel economy, the reduction of pollution, and the reduction of wear on parts that are being used less (when the engine is stopped).